A Peaceful World Awaits You Beyond All Religion

  • Most all religions are based upon a bedrock of lies.
    Moses is based on the Sumerian life and legends of Sargon I, King of Akkad, “set in a basket of rushes and “cast into the river”. Egyptians kept exhausting hieroglyphic records. There is a complete absence of any record of Moses leading over 600,000 men, women and children away from Pharaoh’s army.
    See awesome revelations here: https://beyondallreligion.net/old-testament/
    Joseph Smith, founder of Mormonism, was convicted in a court of Law of being an “impostor”, today a fraud, con man, in 1826. He wrote the Book of Mormon soon after.
    See details here https://beyondallreligion.net/mormonism/
    Question: You decide: Does the text of the verses of the Qur’an correspond exactly to those revealed to Muhammad directly as the words of God, delivered to Muhammad (who married a 6 year old girl) through the angel Gabriel, as claimed? See: https://beyondallreligion.net/islam/
    Christianity was invented by Emperor Constantine , for political purposes, based upon the myth of Mithra, a Persian savior god born on December 25 , son of a virgin. Mithra performed miracles and was later crucified. Pope Leo X (died 1521) called Christ a “Fable”. Later Pope Paul III expressed similar sentiments. See HOW CHRISTIANITY WAS INVENTED: THE TRUTH! here: http://tinyurl.com/lzaqgpc

About beyondallreligion

Samuel Butler, Author: BEYOND ALL RELIGION Most all religions are based upon a bedrock of lies. Christianity was invented by Emperor Constantine , for political purposes, based upon the myth of Mithra, a Persian savior god born on December 25 , son of a virgin. Mithra performed miracles and was later crucified. Pope Leo X (died 1521) called Christ a “Fable”. Later Pope Paul III expressed similar sentiments. Moses is based on the Sumerian life and legends of Sargon I, King of Akkad, “set in a basket of rushes and “cast into the river”. Egyptians kept exhausting hieroglyphic records. There is a complete absence of any record of Moses leading over 600,000 men, women and children away from Pharaoh’s army. Joseph Smith, founder of Mormonism, was convicted in a court of Law of being an “impostor”, today a fraud, con man, in 1826. He wrote the Book of Mormon soon after. Question: You decide: Does the text of the verses of the Qur’an correspond exactly to those revealed to Muhammad directly as the words of God, delivered to Muhammad through the angel Gabriel, as claimed? Sample or Buy New Book “Beyond All Religion”, 152 pgs, $9.95 at www.amazon.com (Kindle edition $3.49) or send mailing address and $9.95 to Sam Butler, SB 197, POB 25292, Miami, FL 33102."
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A Peaceful World Awaits You Beyond All Religion

  1. hipmonkey says:

    Certainly true for today’s mainstream orthodox/fundamental religions. But what the ancient wisdom expressed using mythology does mirror what today’s physics is proving to be correct about the nature of Reality. The ancient Consciousness blazers did find the micro in the macro via Astrotheology. The lie was set in motion when Rome tried to literalize and historicalize these myths. This killed the mystery teachings and ushered in the Dark Ages, of which we seem to still be in, though at the end of it. I can see the nature of reality in the myth of Sophia, Osiris, Horus etc, as well as in quantum physics, the Holographic Universe, String theory etc. Politics murdered spiritual holy science. Par.

  2. Hiram Crespo says:

    I was hoping that you would get into the ‘peaceful world’ that you say awaits people rather than focus on the false beliefs of others. I don’t think atheism by itself gives peace or meaning, but philosophy does. I’ve found peace and joy in humanism thanks to Epicurus and his philosophy (societyofepicurus.com).

    Atheism is a negation (of the absurd beliefs of others), whereas Epicureanism is an affirmation (of reality, of life, of Truth with a capital T). It gives me a solid foundation for my belief, provides a naturalist cosmology and the consolations of applied philosophy are not based on false views.

  3. Saleh says:

    This story written by Ibn Hisham base from Ibn Ishaq, who wrote a work on South Arabian antiquities – Kitab al-Tijan li ma’rifatimuluk alzaman – Book of Crowns in knowing kings of the age.

    What we have here is a story from the South Arabian tradition, meant to explain the presence of the (genealogically) South Arabian Lakhmids in Iraq and al-Hirah. The story is traced back to the time of a generation before Shamir Yur’ish / Yuhar’ish, i.e., the first part of the third century CE, when Rabi’ah b. Nasr had a dream that alarmed him and that continued to disquiet him. Rabi’ah b. Nasr al-Lakhmi is the first figure in the royal genealogy, father of ‘Amr, the father of Imru’ al-Qays I. At the end of the story of the dream, the Lakhmids are made to migrate from Yemen to al-Hirah in order to escape the prophesied invasion of the Ethiopians, being allowed to settle at al-Hirah by the Persian King Ardashir. When Rabiah had this dream, he sent out enquiries among the people of his kingdom and gathered together in his presence every soothsayer, magician, drawer of omens from the flight of birds. Then he informed them, “I have had a dream which has alarmed me and caused me disquiet, so tell me its interpretation.” They replied, “Recount it to us, so that we might inform you of its meaning.” He replied, however, “If I recount it to you, I shall have no confidence that you will be able to tell me its correct interpretation; the only person who will know its correct interpretation is the one who already knows about the dream without my telling him.” When Rabi’ah had said all this to them, one of the assembled group of experts on dreams said, “If the king requires this, then he should send for Satih and Shiqq, for there is no one more knowledgeable than these two, and they will certainly be able to tell you what you ask.” Satih’s (real) name was Rabi’ah b. Mas’-ud b. Mdzin b. Dhi’b b. ‘Ad b. Mdzin b. Ghassdn, and because of his genealogical connections with Dhi’b he was called al-Dhi’bi. Shiqq was the son of Sa’b b. Yashkur b. Ruhm. b. Afrak b. Nadhir b. Qays b. ‘Abqar b. Anmiir.
    [Satih and Shiqq appear in Arabic lore as legendary personages and they have roles in pre-Islamic history as diviners: here for the Lakhmid Rabi’ah but also (anachronistically) for al-Nu’man b. al-Mundhir (IV) and Khusraw An-asharwdn in predicting the fall of the Persian kingdom and the triumph of the Arabs]. This was the event of Qardasiyyah!

    When they told Rabi’ah that, he sent for the two men. Satih came to him before Shiqq; there were no soothsayers like them in their time. So when Satih arrived, the king summoned him and said, “O Satih, I have had a dream which has alarmed me and disquieted me, so tell me about it, for if you comprehend the dream correctly, you will know correctly its interpretation. “Satih replied, “I will do this. You saw in your dream a skull [jumiumah – Abfija’far al-Tabaril says: I have found the rendering of it in other places as ‘. . . I saw blazing coals, humamah’-which came forth from the darkness-and fell upon the lowlands descending to the sea-and devoured there everything with a skull!”]The king said, “O Satih, you have got it exactly right; so what, in your opinion, is the interpretation of it?

    The king said to Satih, “By your father! O Satih, this is indeed distressing and painful for us; but when will this take place, in my own time, or subsequently?” Satih replied, “Nay, indeed, a good while after it more than sixty or seventy years will elapse.” The king said, “Will that dominion of theirs endure, or will it be cut short?” he answered, “Nay, it will be cut short after seventy odd years have gone by and then all of them there will be slain or will be expelled from it as fugitives.” The king said, “Who, then, will assume that task of killing and expelling them?” Satih replied, “Iram of DhuYazan[Muslim lore identified Iram with the Biblical Aram, son of Shem and made various peoples of Arabia his descendants.] When the Qur’an, LXXXIX, 6, speaks of Iram, it is probably referring to a tribe or people, the Antiquities of South Arabia, who will come forth against them from Aden and “not leave a single one of them in Yemen.” The king enquired, “Will Iram’s dominion there endure, or will it be cut short?” He replied, “It will indeed be cut short.” The king said, “And who will cut it short?”
    He replied, “A Prophet, a pure one, to whom the inspired revelation (al-wahy) will come from on high.” The king asked, “Who will this prophet spring from?” He replied, “[He will be] a man from the progeny of Ishaq-his dominion over his people shall last until the end of time.” The king said, “0 Satih, will time (al-dahr) have an end?” He replied, “Yes, a day on which the first generations and the last generations will be assembled, the righteous will be joyful on it but the evil doers shall be made wretched.” The king said, “Is what you are informing us true, 0 Satih?” the latter replied, “Yes, by the redness of the dying sun at evening and the beginning of the darkness of nightand the dawn when it is complete-what I have told you is undoubtedly true. ”

    When Satih had finished, Shiqq arrived, so the king summoned him. He said, “O Shiqq, I have had a dream that has alarmed and disquieted me, so tell me about it, for if you comprehend the dream correctly, you will know correctly its interpretation,” just as he had said to Satih. But he concealed from him what Satih had said in order that he might see whether the two interpretations agreed or differed. Shiqq said, “Yes, you saw a skull, which came forth from the darkness, and fell upon all the, land, meadows, and thickets and devoured everything there with living breath.” When that king perceived that the words of the two soothsayers agreed with each other totally, he said to Shiqq, “0 Shiqq, you have got it exactly right, so what, in your opinion, is the interpretation of it?” Shiqq replied, “I swear by the men living between the two harrahs, THE BLACKS [Ethiopians] will certainly come down on your land and will seize custody of every tender one from your hands and will then rule over all the land from Abyan to Najran.” [Again implying the whole length of Yemen, since Najran lay on its north-eastern fringes.] The king exclaimed, “By your father! O Shiqq, this is indeed distressing and painful for us; but when will this take place, in my own time, or subsequently?” Shiqq answered, “Nay indeed, a stretch of time after you-then a mighty one, lofty of status, shall rescue you from it-and will make them taste the deepest abasement.” The king said, “Who is this person mighty of status?”

    Shiqq retorted, “A youth neither base nor inadequate for what he attempts, he will issue forth from the house of DhuYazan.” The king said, “Will his dominion endure, or will it be cut short?” He replied, “Indeed, it will be ended by a Prophet who will be sent,who will come with right and justice among the people of religion and virtue. The dominion will remain among his people until the Day of Separation.One may ask, ‘What is the Day of Separation? ” -The reply is, the day on which those near to God will be recompensed invocations from the heavens will be made which both the quick and the dead shall hear and on which the people will be gathered together at the appointed place on which there will be salvation and blessings for those who fear God.” The king said, “Is what you say true, O Shiqq?” The latter replied, “Yes, by the lord of heaven and earth and the highlands and the lowlands which lie between them, what I have communicated to you is indeed the truth, in which there is no dissimulation. ”

    When the king had finished questioning the two men, there came into his mind that what the two of them had told him regarding the invasion of the Ethiopians was really going to take place, so he fitted out his sons and other members of his house for the journey to Iraq, together with what they needed, and wrote on their behalf to one of the kings of Persia called Adashir, son of Khurrazdd, [Presumably the reference is to Shabur I, since his father Ardashir’s mother was Khurrazad, who allowed them to settle at al-Hirah]. AI-Nu’man b. al-Mundhir, the king of al-Hirah, was a descendant of Rabi’ah b. Nasr; he is al-Nu’man b. al-Mundhir b. al-Nu’man b. al-Mundhir b. ‘Amr b. ‘Adi b. Rabi’ah b. Nasr, that same king in the genealogy and the lore of the scholars of Yemen . As noted above the dream described thus becomes an explanation for the movement of a South Arabian group like the Lakhmid family from Yemen to Iraq.

    There related to us Ibn Hisham, who said: When Satih and Shiqq told that to Rabi’ah b. Nasr, and Rabi’ah did with regard to his sons and other members of his house what he in fact did, the mention of all this spread among the Arabs, and they talked about it extensively until his fame and his reputation for knowledge became widely disseminated among them. However, what the soothsayer said were not 100%. The only truth they said was that of the coming of the Last Prophet after the Greco-Roman / Ethiopian invasion. To establish these facts, I will outline the time and the people involved.

    1. Quranic and historical evidence proofs that the Quranic Last Prophet was NEVER an Arab as per the Quran – 12:06; 29:27; not born in the 7th Century CE in Mecca; and no evidence what so ever of an Arab Prophet that exists in the 7th Century CE. However, there was a Prophet who was born in the 3rd Century – 214 CE and claimed himself the Last of the Prophets and the Paraclete. If there is a migration of believe than that prophet was the true Quranic Last Prophet of ALLAH. He was known as Prophet Mani [P]. Ironically, the Quran was not traditionally written in the Arabic script. Quranic evidence – 44:58; tells us that the Quran was sent to the Prophet in his tongue. As such, Prophet Mani [P] who spoke the Manichean language originating from Babylon, the Grand Quran was written in Manichean language. These evidence proofs that “Manichean” is the ‘prestige dialect’ of the Grand Quran. There is already an element of translation inherent in the Quran in which there are 7.

    2. The Sasanian King Ardashir, who ruled in 224 to 242 CE, shows clearly that Rabiah b, Nasr was his contemporary. History tells us that King Ardahir and his son, Shapur I [ruled from 242 to 272] was very staunch supporter of Prophet Mani. History also tells us that Rabiah b. Nasr’s grandson Amr b. Adi b. Rabiah b. Nasr who was the 1stLakhmid King and father of Imru AlQays, was also a staunch supporter of Prophet Mani. He also maintained close relation with the Persians and ruled before and after the time of King Ardashir. [source: Byzantine and the Arabs in the 4th Century Irfan Shahid and DeArabizing Arabia by Irfan Shahid and Saad Abulhab respectively]

    3. The Ethiopians occupied Yemen, and the events which had previously been talking about, including the interpretations of the two soothsayers, came to pass, and proofs that the royal titulature of the Ethiopian Negus in the 4th Century was along one that included the South Arabian titles of “King of Himyar, Saba, Raydan and Salhen”, very similar to what Shammar Yuha’rish, who claimed the royal style as “King of Sabaʾ and the Raydān and Hadhramaut. This composite title has been somewhat of a “puzzle” and as such one of the explanations – the most natural one – can relate it to an Ethiopian victory over the Sabaeans of South Arabia, resulting in the acquisition by the victorious Negus of the titles of his vanquished adversary, the Sabaeans King. This was in the year 270 – 300 CE.[source: Byzantine and the Arabs in the 4th Century by authored Irfan Shahid]

    4. Shammar Yuha’rish, in AD 275, he led his troops to victory over Najran, Mareb and Hadhramaut. He succeeded in “uniting” much of Yemen, assuming the title “King of Saba and Dhu Raydan and Hadhramaut and Yamnat”. Khawarizmi, a prominient Muslim scholar who lived from 780 t0 850 CE, called him Shimr Yar’ish or Abu Karab Alifriqis, which could means he was of African origins considering the fact that he used the word “Alifriqis”. This proofs that he was the Ethiopian Negus that conquered Yemen as predicted by the two soothsayers. [Source: DeArabizing Arabia by Saad Abulhab]

    5. The case of a joint Roman-Ethiopians expedition and possibly for an occupation of South Arabia, however short, may be supported by reference in the Byzantine sources relating to the reign of Constantine and his son Constantius, who sends an ecclesiastical mission to both Ethiopia and Himyar in a way that implies a relationship of some sort and what is more, suggests that the two countries were conceived by the autokratoras one region. Constantine edicts regulating the travel of his political agents to those parts, in which, he speaks of gentem Axumetarumet Homeritarum. The used of the singular, gentem, is significant; it implies that the two peoples were under one political domination![source: Byzantine and the Arabs in the 4th Century authored Irfan Shahid]

    6. Most importantly of these events that happened in the 3rd / 4th Century is validated by the Quran in Surah Arrum – verses 2 to 4.

    30:02 The Romans have won.
    30:03 At the lowest part on the earth. But after their victory, they will be defeated.
    30:04 In several years. The decision before and after is for ALLAH, and on that day the believers will rejoice.

    The Quranic evidence shows that the Romans who have won will be defeated in several years’ later. Historical evidences show that on the Romans side, they lost much of their territory in the middle of the 4th Century. On the Persian side, it was the Century of Shapur II, who reigned from 326 – 379 CE. Shabur II aggressiveness was irredentist and that set the two world powers in collision course. He considered the Diocletianic acquisition of the Mesopotamian and Trans-Tigrine provinces a rape. He was thus determine to recover the lost provinces. And it was not until the latter half of the Century and by the terms of the Peace of Jovian in 363 CE and of the settlement in 387 CE that the Persian considered the wrong has been righted.

    These events proofs ALLAH promise the truth. It also proofs that the Traditional Islamic history is nothing but a lie against ALLAH and also to mankind!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s